the beautiful and the ugly

(star nosed mole – found on nytimes.com)

The past two days there have been a few articles about ugliness in the NY Times.  Examples: one about animals (“A Masterpiece of Nature? Yuck!”) and one about humans (“The Phenomenology of Ugly”).  What is driving this discussion about ugliness?  Why are we fascinated by it?  The author of “The Phenomenology of Ugly” draws a correlation between ugliness and philosophers – must one be ugly to practice philosophy?  Meaning, must one essentially “get over” how one looks before one can investigate deeper truths?  He discusses Sartre’s ugliness and his use of that as a tool in his philosophy – that he described it as a disability.

What does it mean to be beautiful, or ugly?  What clues do our features give away to others?  What stories do our disfiguring scars tell?  Can we track these stories?

To watch Umberto Eco (a prominent Italian semiotician, philosopher, literary critic, and novelist) give a lecture On the History of Ugliness, click here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s